Radiometric dating planets

Rated 4.30/5 based on 969 customer reviews

We are told that these methods are accurate to a few percent, and that there are many different methods.

We are told that of all the radiometric dates that are measured, only a few percent are anomalous.

You are here: Home Group Science and Technology Astronomy Astronomy. Geologist determine the age of rock using a technique called radioactive dating. How can radioactive dating find the age of Earth when those elements were.

History of half-lives and astronomy of the dinosaur era, carbon dating speed.

Even the creationist accounts that I have read do not adequately treat these issues.

At the start, let me clarify that my main concern is not the age of the earth, the moon, or the solar system, but rather the age of life, that is, how long has life existed on earth.

After study and discussion of this question, I now believe that the claimed accuracy of radiometric dating methods is a result of a great misunderstanding of the data, and that the various methods hardly ever agree with each other, and often do not agree with the assumed ages of the rocks in which they are found.

Since there doesn't seem to be any systematic error that could cause so many methods to agree with each other so often, it seems that there is no other rational conclusion than to accept these dates as accurate.

Astronomers long ago worked out that the most detectable cycles.

Through a complex system of carbon dating and radiometric dating we can determine the.

However, there may be other explanations for this apparent age. I also believe that the evidence indicates that the earth has recently undergone a violent catastrophe.

Perhaps the earth was made from older pre-existing matter, or perhaps decay rates were briefly faster for some reason. Geologic time is divided up into periods, beginning with the Precambrian, followed by the Cambrian and a number of others, leading up to the present.

Leave a Reply